Commons:Undeletion requests
Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV
On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.
This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.
Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:
Finding out why a file was deleted
First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.
If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.
Appealing a deletion
Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.
If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:
- You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
- If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
- If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
- If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.
Temporary undeletion
Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.
- if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
- if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.
To assist discussion
Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).
To allow transfer of fair use content to another project
Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.
Projects that accept fair use |
---|
* Wikipedia:
als
| ar
| bar
| bn
| be
| be-tarask
| ca
| el
| en
| et
| eo
| fa
| fi
| fr
| frr
| he
| hr
| hy
| id
| is
| it
| ja
| lb
| lt
| lv
| mk
| ms
| pt
| ro
| ru
| sl
| sr
| th
| tr
| tt
| uk
| vi
| zh
| +/−
Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links. |
Adding a request
First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:
- Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
- Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
- In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like
[[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]]
is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.) - Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
- State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
- Sign your request using four tilde characters (
~~~~
). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.
Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.
Closing discussions
In general, discussions should be closed only by administrators.
Archives
Current requests
こちらの写真は私が撮影・編集したものです。 最初にアップロードした際は著作者の記名を忘れおり、削除されてしまったので再アップロードしました。そのことにつきましては注意等を十分に確認しておらず大変申し訳ありませんでした。 今後はこういうことがないように十分注意します。 この写真は私が撮影・編集したものですので問題はありません。ですのでファイルの復元をお願いします。
This photo was taken and edited by me. When I first uploaded it, I forgot the author's name and it was deleted, so I re-uploaded it. I am very sorry that I did not fully check the instructions. I'll be very careful not to let this happen again. This picture was taken and edited by me, so there is no problem. So please restore the file.
(たいやき部屋 (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC))
- @たいやき部屋: Hi, You were asked to upload the original image with EXIF data. Why can't you do that? Yann (talk) 09:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Where should I upload my original images?
- Can't I use the image edited for personal information protection? たいやき部屋 (talk) 10:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I understood what you were saying.
- Upload it the appropriate way. たいやき部屋 (talk) 12:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Images were published after 2015, expiration of posthumous copyright protection of photographer after death, or before 1954. Overly hypothetical doubts by now-banned user who made many overzealous deletion requests. Kges1901 (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose As I noted in the DR, these are either under URAA copyright, as are all Russian images published after 1942, or, if unpublished until recently, are under copyright in Russia. In either case we cannot keep them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- We usually assume that old works were published at the time of creation, unless evidence says otherwise. If I understood correctly, the author was a reporter for RIAN, so I see no reason to assume that these pictures were not published at the time. The first file in the list, File:Сессия Верховного Совета СССР первого созыва (2).jpg, is dated 1938. That may not be sufficient for all images, but it seems OK for this one. Yann (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Troshkin was a reporter for the newspaper Izvestiya, and his photographs were published at the time in Izvestiya, Krasnaya Zvezda, and other papers. --Kges1901 (talk) 20:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg also made an interesting argument about the country of origin. If these newspapers were distributed in the Soviet Union, they were simultaneously published in all successor nations, and that under the Berne Convention, the shorter term applies. Yann (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- These newspapers were distributed across the entire Soviet Union, not just on the territory of the RSFSR. In any case, the definition of publication under Russian copyright law is that the back of the photograph was marked by the artist in the appropriate way, which for war photographs implies that it passed through censorship processes and could be published. Since most of these photographs are not taken from the photographer's negatives, it is reasonable to assume that they were marked on the back, and recently digitized images appeared on the internet after 2014, when the posthumous publication copyright term expired. Kges1901 (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg is not sole in such assumption. But this is just assumption so far, it is not supported by court decisions (of 12-15 post-Soviet states) or jurisprudential literature (as I have known on today, I continue to seek it, to confirm or refute it). As I see such questions in court decisions (of several post-Soviet states) or jurisprudential literature - the concrete Soviet republic is place of publishing (because, the civil legislation was on republican level) or the RF is place of publishing, even if work was published outside of the RSFSR (as USSR-successor on union level). Alex Spade (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Carl Lindberg also made an interesting argument about the country of origin. If these newspapers were distributed in the Soviet Union, they were simultaneously published in all successor nations, and that under the Berne Convention, the shorter term applies. Yann (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Troshkin was a reporter for the newspaper Izvestiya, and his photographs were published at the time in Izvestiya, Krasnaya Zvezda, and other papers. --Kges1901 (talk) 20:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure there is any test case over the Berne definition of "country of origin". The question would not come up internally for Russian law or that of the old republics, most likely. It would only matter in a country outside those which implement the rule of the shorter term, and over a work which that question may be involved. Not sure I know of any, anywhere. But, the Berne Convention is pretty specific in its definition when it comes to works simultaneously published in multiple countries, and that is the definition that Commons follows. Of course, the Soviet Union was not a member, though most all subsequent countries are now. One complication is the U.S. status -- the definition of "source country" for the URAA would follow different logic than Berne, the country of "greatest contacts with the work", which would be Russia. Russia was 50pma on the URAA date, but I think had some wartime extensions, which I think push these over the line, such that only ones published before 1929 (or created before 1904, if unpublished) would be PD in the U.S., regardless of current status in Russia, or the country of origin (if different). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I do not know such cases (on the Berne definition) too, but in the Russian copyright legislation there are 3 criterions of copyrightability - (1) the Russian territory (the territory of the Russian Federation (the RSFSR previously, not the USSR) since Nov.7, 1917 to today) in the borders on the date of publication, (2) the Russian citizenship on the date of publication, and (3) international treaties.
Moreover, there is similar situation with reports of telegraph agencies or press-releases- they are reported/released worldwide formally, but the country indicated in report/release is the country of origin (some reports/releases have two of more indicated countries). Alex Spade (talk) 22:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)- Right -- the Berne country of origin pretty much never applies to internal works, or even most situations involving foreign works. The specific definition in Berne pretty much only matters if a country is applying the rule of the shorter term for a foreign work to have lesser protection than their own works normally do; the Berne definition would have to be used in that case to determine the country, since that is in the treaty. In pretty much any other situation, more sensical definitions can be used (which even the US did, with the URAA -- the "source country" there is pretty much the same thing, but differs quite a bit once it comes to simultaneous publication). But however nonsensical it seems, Commons uses the Berne definition, since that should control when works expire in many countries (even if that virtually never comes up in a court case to test it). Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I do not know such cases (on the Berne definition) too, but in the Russian copyright legislation there are 3 criterions of copyrightability - (1) the Russian territory (the territory of the Russian Federation (the RSFSR previously, not the USSR) since Nov.7, 1917 to today) in the borders on the date of publication, (2) the Russian citizenship on the date of publication, and (3) international treaties.
- I'm not sure there is any test case over the Berne definition of "country of origin". The question would not come up internally for Russian law or that of the old republics, most likely. It would only matter in a country outside those which implement the rule of the shorter term, and over a work which that question may be involved. Not sure I know of any, anywhere. But, the Berne Convention is pretty specific in its definition when it comes to works simultaneously published in multiple countries, and that is the definition that Commons follows. Of course, the Soviet Union was not a member, though most all subsequent countries are now. One complication is the U.S. status -- the definition of "source country" for the URAA would follow different logic than Berne, the country of "greatest contacts with the work", which would be Russia. Russia was 50pma on the URAA date, but I think had some wartime extensions, which I think push these over the line, such that only ones published before 1929 (or created before 1904, if unpublished) would be PD in the U.S., regardless of current status in Russia, or the country of origin (if different). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello.. Please return the image because it is a free image of a public figure and is allowed to be circulated and is not restricted by rights at all. The following link contains a copy of the image on the personal website of its owner, writer https://www.binsudah.ae/قصة-عجيبة-من-التاريخ/--JovaYas (talk) 20:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The footer on the link provided states: جميع الحقوق محفوظة لموقع حسين بن سوده - 2015 (All rights reserved to Hussein Bin Souda website). @-JovaYas: the term "free license" has a precise definition that you consult in COM:L. Günther Frager (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for your response. I would like to explain the following: the purpose of uploading the image here is to use it on the individual's page in the encyclopedia, and the title is his name. His Wikipedia page includes a link to his personal website, in addition to the fact that the image has been circulating for years, like any image of a public figure. The management of the writer's website has been contacted for the purpose of licensing the image at the following link [1]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JovaYas: that is not a free license. Did you read the link provided?. It would be more productive if you ask the copyright holder to send an explicit permission to COM:VRT . Günther Frager (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the guidance and cooperation, and we contacted the management of the writer's website to amend the formulation and the full waiver of the Wikipedia website - the following link [2]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JovaYas: that is not a free license. Did you read the link provided?. It would be more productive if you ask the copyright holder to send an explicit permission to COM:VRT . Günther Frager (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for your response. I would like to explain the following: the purpose of uploading the image here is to use it on the individual's page in the encyclopedia, and the title is his name. His Wikipedia page includes a link to his personal website, in addition to the fact that the image has been circulating for years, like any image of a public figure. The management of the writer's website has been contacted for the purpose of licensing the image at the following link [1]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The notice on the cited website now reads,
- "This image is fully licensed for publication and use on the Wikipedia website - https://commons.wikimedia.org, and they have the right to use the image on any of their platforms, this is a waiver of rights - the management of the Hussein bin Sudah website 17-08-2024".
- Since the permission is limited to Commons, it is not the free license for any use by anybody anywhere that is required here. In order for us to restore the image, the license must be changed to CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, or another acceptable license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello sir.. It has been edited to be general and not specific.[3]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 14:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Again, that is not irrevocable and does not mention derivative works. Please follow my instructions above,
- In order for us to restore the image, the license must be changed to CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, or another acceptable license."
- See COM:L. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- We worked so hard to make this very ordinary image acceptable to you, that we asked the site to remove the copyright notice at the bottom of the site for JovaYas (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JovaYas: Removing the copyright notice doesn't remove the copyright on the image. As Jim writes above, we need a free license. Yann (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your patience and understanding. The wording of the image license has been amended by referencing the Creative Commons license - CC BY [4]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello.. The owner of the photo personally contacted you via his official email, .. regarding the photo. Please check the email. JovaYas (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your patience and understanding. The wording of the image license has been amended by referencing the Creative Commons license - CC BY [4]https://www.binsudah.ae/binsudah-2/ JovaYas (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JovaYas: Removing the copyright notice doesn't remove the copyright on the image. As Jim writes above, we need a free license. Yann (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- We worked so hard to make this very ordinary image acceptable to you, that we asked the site to remove the copyright notice at the bottom of the site for JovaYas (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Again, that is not irrevocable and does not mention derivative works. Please follow my instructions above,
Russian department awards
Please, restore deleted Russian department awards and close (as keep) similar current DR. Alex Spade (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Closed DR discussions
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Awards of Rostekhnadzor
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Medals of Rostekhnadzor
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Medals of Ministry of Sport (Russia)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Awards of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Current DR discussions
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Russian Federation Investigative Committee medals
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Medals of Ministry of Transport (Russia)
Yes, they are not state awards, but they are state symbols ({{PD-RU-exempt}}) indeed - symbols, which are established by state authorities, which design (including both text description and visual representation) are established (which design are integral part of) in respective official documents of state government agencies (the Russian official documents are not just texts), which are subjects of the en:State Heraldic Register of the Russian Federation (point 3 subpoint 4). Alex Spade (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Any opinion about this? Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Two ConventionExtension screenshots
- File:Conference Dashboard - ConventionExtension.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Conference Setup - ConventionExtension.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
These files was speedily deleted as copyright violations. I was originally going to request undeletion on the basis of them being screenshots of free software (i.e., {{MediaWiki screenshot}}); annoyingly, though, the Git repository of the MediaWiki extension that they're screenshots of doesn't appear to contain a license statement of any kind. However, I noticed that the account that uploaded these files (Chughakshay16) is the same account that developed the extension in the first place (see mw:User:Chughakshay16/ConventionExtension, git:mediawiki/extensions/ConventionExtension/+log) - therefore, even if this extension's code isn't freely licensed, Chughakshay16 would nevertheless have the ability and authority to release screenshots of the results of their own programming under a free license (as they did when they uploaded the files in question to Commons); and these freely-licensed screenshots are therefore not copyvios.
At User talk:Moheen#Screenshot of conference extension deleted?, the deleting admin mentioned that the files were tagged as likely belong[ing] to Cisco Webex; however, I didn't see anything that would indicate that Cisco holds a copyright over this extension's code (or that would prohibit the code's author from being able to freely license screenshots of its results).
All the best, --A smart kitten (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Any opinion about this? Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Template:Parliament.bg - all files as well
The text in the copyright information page was edited by the National Assembly for clarity and now states:
The National Assembly is the holder of the copyright of the software ensuring the functioning of the Internet portal and its design.
The content of the portal of the National Assembly can be used freely, unless it is explicitly stated that it is subject to protection under the current Law on copyright and related rights. Therefore, the use of textual content, photos, video materials and other visual elements found on the portal is public and requires only citation.
The content owned by the National Assembly on this internet portal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, respectively Appendix No. 2 to Art. 16, paragraph 1 of the Ordinance on the standard conditions for using information from the public sector and for its publication in an open format.
All web portal content is accessible in real-time via a public REST API. View API documentation - click here.''
The deletion request is archived here.
Pelajanela (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Any opinion about this? Yann (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- The text is now explicit about being CC-BY-4.0. @Ellywa: I'm willing to restore the template and associated files if others agree. Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. Ellywa (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've restored the template and the supporting files that I deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Associated deleted files: (put here for my convenance so I can use Restore-A-Lot)
- I've restored the template and the supporting files that I deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. Ellywa (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- The text is now explicit about being CC-BY-4.0. @Ellywa: I'm willing to restore the template and associated files if others agree. Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Aleksandra Sterkova (46NS).png
- File:Aleksandra Milcheva (47NS).png
- File:Aleksandra Korcheva (47NS).png
- File:Aleksandar Paunov (44NS).png
- File:Aleksandar Paunov (42NS).png
- File:Aleksandar Paunov (39NS).png
- File:Albena Vurbanova (45NS).png
- File:Albena Naydenova (44NS).png
- File:Akseniya Tileva (42NS).png
- File:Ahmed Yusein (39NS).png
- File:Ahmed Vranchev (50NS).png
- File:Ahmed Dogan (39NS).png
- File:Ahmed Bashev (42NS).png
- File:Adlen Shevked (44NS).png
- File:Adrian Asenov (42NS).png
- File:Adlen Shevked (45NS).png
- File:Ahmed Ahmedov (43NS).png
- File:Ahmed Ahmedov (45NS).png.
- I'll do more later (this might take me a few days to restore all files. Abzeronow (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
(more for convenient undeletion)
- File:Shendoan Halit (50NS).png
- File:Etien Levi (50NS).png
- File:Vladimir Danailov (50NS).png
- File:Mihail Stavrev (50NS).png
- File:Georgi Kukov (50NS).png
- File:Nikolay Zlatarski (50NS).png
- File:Krasimir Yordanov (50NS).png
- File:Tatyana Siveva (50NS).png
- File:Kiril Todorov (50NS).png
- File:Nezhdet Shaban (50NS).png
- File:Venetsiya Angova (50NS).png
- File:Atanas Atanasov (50NS).png
- File:Esheref Esheref (50NS).png
- File:Irena Neginova (50NS).png
- File:Ayten Sabri (50NS).png
- File:Raya Ivanova (50NS).png
- File:Yordan Todorov (50NS).png
- File:Tsveta Karayancheva (50NS).png
- File:Violeta Karpacheva (50NS).png
- I'll undelete more tomorrow. Abzeronow (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Stoyan Taslakov (50NS).png
- File:Slavcho Krumov (50NS).png
- File:Nebie Kabak (50NS).png
- File:Margarita Mahaeva (50NS).png
- File:Lyubomir Hristov (50NS).png
- File:Daniel Petrov (50NS).png
- File:Ivan Minev (50NS).png
- File:Genadi Sabkov (50NS).png
- File:Tervel Georgiev (50NS).png
- File:Ivaylo Kostadinov (50NS).png
- File:Ibraim Zaydenov (50NS).png
- File:Fatima Yaldas (50NS).png
- File:Ivo Tsanev (50NS).png
- File:Yuliana Mateeva (50NS).png
- File:Rositsa Kalinova (50NS).png
- File:Radostin Kolev (50NS).png
- File:Pavlin Petrov (50NS).png
- File:Katya Kayryakova (50NS).png
- File:Dafinka Semerdzhieva (50NS).png
- File:Levent Memish (50NS).png
- File:Katya Paneva (50NS).png
- File:Milen Deliyski (50NS).png
- File:Kristian Ganchev (50NS).png
- File:Pavela Mitova (50NS).png
- File:Georgi Georgiev (50NS).png
- File:Petya Dimitrova (50NS).png
- File:Nikolay Bratovanov (50NS).png
- File:Krasimira Katincharova (50NS).png
- File:Darin Georgiev (50NS).png
- I'll try to get more undeleted tomorrow (was so busy I could only manage this batch). Abzeronow (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:Viktoriya Vasileva (50NS).png
- File:Nikolay Markov (50NS).png
- File:Hristo Borisov (50NS).png
- File:Yordanka Fandakova (50NS).png
- File:Dzhem Yamenov (50NS).png
- File:Bogdan Bogdanov (50NS).png
- File:Larisa Savova (50NS).png
- File:Vyara Todeva (50NS).png
- File:Dimitar Nikolov (50NS).png
- File:Zahari Borachev (50NS).png
- File:Yusein Veyselov (50NS).png
- File:Timur Halilov (50NS).png
- File:Margarita Gencheva (50NS).png
- File:Kaloyan Metodiev (50NS).png
- File:Iskra Mihaylova (50NS).png
- File:Hyusein Hafazov (50NS).png
- File:Zvezdelina Karavelova (50NS).png
- File:Angel Slavchev (50NS).png
- File:Atidzhe Alieva-Veli (50NS).png
- File:Angel Yanchev (50NS).png
- File:Daniela Djeneva (50NS).png
- File:Members of the 50th Parliament take oath.jpg
- File:Yordan Krastanov (49NS).png
- File:Milena Dimova (49NS).png
- File:Veniamin Vodenicharov (49NS).png
- File:Petia Stavreva (49NS).png
- File:Vera Aleksandrova (49NS).png
- File:Manol Manolov (49NS).png
- File:Valentin Radev (49NS).png
- File:Ivan Belchev (48NS).png
- File:Nikolay Hadjigenov (46NS).png
- File:Plamen Panayotov (39NS).png
- File:Ana Barakova (43NS).png
- File:Vencislav Varbanov (41NS).png
- File:Anastasia Dimitrova-Moser (39NS).png
- File:Mukaddes Nalbant (45NS).png
- More tomorrow (working my way up to doing 50 in a batch). Abzeronow (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:Borislav Sandov (45NS).png
- File:Petur Slavov (43NS).png
- File:Nikolay Svinarov (39NS).png
- File:Petar Beron (40NS).png
- File:Lydia Shuleva (40NS).png
- File:Stefan Sofiyanski (40NS).png
- File:Ivan Nikolaev Ivanov (41NS).png
- File:Rositsa Kirova (45NS).png
- File:Nadezhda Neynski (39NS).png
- File:Asen Baltov (47NS).png
- File:Antoni Trenchev (43NS).png
- File:Philip Dimitrov (40NS).png
- File:Maya Manolova (42NS).png
- File:Georgi Pirinski (39NS).png
- File:Neli Dimitrova (49NS).png
- File:Slavcho Krumov (49NS).png
- File:Svetoslav Todorov (49NS).png
- File:Margarita Mahaeva (49NS).png
- File:Krastyo Vrachev (49NS).png
- File:Antoniy Krustev (41NS).png
- File:Vladislav Dimitrov (41NS).png
- File:Valentin Mikev (41NS).png
- File:Yordanka Georgieva (49NS).png
- File:Rositsa Pandova-Yovkova (49NS).png
- File:Tsvetan Predov (49NS).png
- File:Svilen Trifonov (49NS).png
- File:Stanislav Bogdanski (49NS).png
- File:Mediha Mehmed-Hamza (49NS).png
- File:Kalin Kalapankov (49NS).png
- File:Kristina Petkova (49NS).png
- File:Iliya Batashki (42NS).png
- File:Petur Dulev (42NS).png
- File:Emanuela Spasova (41NS).png
- File:Emil Karanikolov (41NS).png
- File:Zhelyazko Zhelyazkov (42NS).png
- File:Yordan Todorov (49NS).png
- File:Emil Yankov (49NS).png
- File:Dimitar Gyurev (49NS).png
- File:Daniel Prodanov (49NS).png
- File:Violeta Karpacheva (49NS).png
- File:Deyan Nikolov (49NS).png
- File:Elvan Gyurkash (49NS).png
- File:Ivaylo Mitkovski (49NS).png
- File:Dimitrina Hadzhieva-Nedina (49NS).png
- File:Dzhenal Topalova-Yashar (49NS).png
- File:Valentin Tonchev (49NS).png
- File:Dimcho Dimchev (49NS).png
- File:Georgi Krastev (49NS).png
- File:Maksim Genchev (45NS).png
- File:Iliya Iliev (43NS).png
- File:Vanina Vetsina (49NS).png
- File:Toma Tomov (44NS).png
- File:Anton Adamov (45NS).png
- File:Stoyan Bozhinov (44NS).png
- File:Georgi Vergiev (44NS).png
- File:Stanislav Popov (44NS).png
- File:Mitko Polihronov (44NS).png
- File:Tanya Petrova (44NS).png
- File:Martin Tinchev (44NS).png
- File:Erol Mehmed (44NS).png
- File:Andon Donchev (44NS).png
- File:Kamen Petkov (41NS).png
- File:Valeri Sirakov (49NS).png
- File:Dimitur Gorov (41NS).png
- File:Valeri Mitov (49NS).png
- File:Valentina Dimova (49NS).png
- Another batch of around 50 tomorrow. Abzeronow (talk) 21:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:Borislav Milanov (43NS).png
- File:Yuliya Ivanova (47NS).png
- File:Kiril Kolev (42NS).png
- File:Antoniy Yordanov (42NS).png
- File:Antoniy Yordanov (41NS).png
- File:Georgi Kyuchukov (43NS).png
- File:Zhivko Martinov (43NS).png
- File:Stefan Zhelev (43NS).png
- File:Ventsislav Kaymakanov (43NS).png
- File:Vladislav Nikolov (42NS).png
- File:Kuncho Filipov (43NS).png
- File:Boyka Marinska (43NS).png
- File:Mehmed Ataman (43NS).png
- File:Mehmed Ataman (42NS).png
- File:Klavdiya Gancheva (43NS).png
- File:Emil Raynov (42NS).png
- File:Evgeni Stoev (41NS).png
- File:Ventsislava Lyubenova (47NS).png
- File:Ventsislav Petkov (47NS).png
- File:Petur Hristov Petrov (43NS).png
- File:Vladimir Ivanov (42NS).png
- File:Katya Popova (43NS).png
- File:Rumen Stoilov (41NS).png
- File:Mariana Georgieva (43NS).png
- File:Ivan Dimitrov (45NS).png
- File:Ilko Stoyanov (45NS).png
- File:Mincho Kuminev (46NS).png
- File:Mincho Kuminev (40NS).png
- File:Boris Tsvetkov (45NS).png
- File:Boris Tsvetkov (42NS).png
- File:Vili Lilkov (43NS).png
- File:Toma Tomov (39NS).png
- File:Stoil Stoilov (47NS).png
- File:Yordanka Kostadinova (47NS).png
- File:Dimitur Tashev (47NS).png
- File:Dimitur Gochev (47NS).png
- File:Rumyana Bachvarova (44NS).png
- File:Rumyana Bachvarova (43NS).png
- File:Viktor Nasur (47NS).png
- File:Fikret Shabanov (40NS).png
- File:Kostadin Kobakov (40NS).png
- File:Stoyan Tonev (43NS).png
- File:Blagovest Belev (47NS).png
- File:Pavel Marinov (42NS).png
- File:Nikolay Kostadinov (48NS).png
- File:Ivan Ivanov (39NS).png
- File:Valentin Radev (43NS).png
- File:Valentin Radev (42NS).png
- File:Vladimir Tabutov (48NS).png
- File:Vladimir Tabutov (47NS).png
- File:Stoyan Ivanov (40NS).png
- File:Vladimir Damgov (40NS).png
- File:Todor Kosturski (39NS).png
- File:Dimitur Gechev (46NS).png
- File:Dimitur Gechev (44NS).png
- File:Dimitur Gechev (43NS).png
- File:Ivan Ibrishimov (42NS).png
- File:Reyhan Ablekim (40NS).png
those files deleted as no FoP in Georgia but they are just graffiti. I think that COM:GRAFFITI applies. Template {{Non-free graffiti}} should be added as well. We have a lot's of them in Category:Non-free graffiti. -- Geagea (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Documentation of Template:Non-free graffiti states: "Note that this template doesn't have enough help on the undeletion requests, deleted files are unlikely to be restored just because of the potential application of this tag.". Günther Frager (talk) 18:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- that's not just because the template. The template is only for information. The deletion rational was no FoP in Georgia. But it is not FoP issue. I linked COM:GRAFFITI and we have a lots of files in Category:Non-free graffiti. -- Geagea (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose But Georgia does not have FOP anyway. Also, these are murals by unknown artists, not just text or tags. Thuresson (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- So graffiti is a FoP case? If FoP in Georgia will be ok than the graffiti also ok? Aren't they in temporarily exhibition by definition. If they just a case of FoP it's not very clear in COM:GRAFFITI. -- Geagea (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- For better or worse, we have allowed photos of illegal graffiti by policy regardless of FoP laws -- but we prefer using the FoP tags, or PD tags, if those apply rather than relying on that rationale. If this looks like "legal graffiti", i.e. murals, then we should not allow it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
is it ok if i change into a public domain thing? (I'm sry, I didn't know I chose the wrong license). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PauCloned (talk • contribs) 07:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- @PauCloned: What is the source of this file? Yann (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- nvm, theres already an img (btw its nasa worldview. idk the satellite. (possibly noaa-20/21 or suomi)) PauCloned (talk) 04:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- also its ok if the image is undeleted PauCloned (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PauCloned: We need an evidence. That's why I ask for the source. Yann (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- i used nasa worldview PauCloned (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PauCloned: We need an evidence. That's why I ask for the source. Yann (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- also its ok if the image is undeleted PauCloned (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- nvm, theres already an img (btw its nasa worldview. idk the satellite. (possibly noaa-20/21 or suomi)) PauCloned (talk) 04:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think this is in scope. The description is "Possibly Hone [2024 Pacific cyclone] as a subtropical remnant" -- I'm not sure why we need an image that is "possibly" something and that shows only a cloud mass with no particular pattern. We have a good variety of images in Category:Hurricane Hone. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Along with a few others that have been undeleted, this was also taken from my phone... by me Big ooga booga mf (talk) 10:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This has been removed, despite being the official logo adopted in May 2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max Epper (talk • contribs) 23:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Max Epper: Please explain why it should be undeleted and why it should be kept at a repository for freely licensed images. Where does the Creative Commons license come from? Thuresson (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Complex logo, no permission. --Yann (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
An Bildern menschlicher, männlicher Achselbehaarung dürfte es nichts verwerfliches geben. Auch andere haben dazu Bilder eingestellt. Marc66 (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Buenas administradores,por favor restaure la imagen,esta en el Dominio Público ({{PD-textlogo}}) por que el logo de Irkut Corporation (ahora Yakovlev) es ineligible del copyright por ejemplo (File:UAC Irkut Corp logo.svg)
AbchyZa22 20:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info Relevant DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yakovlev SJ-100 Logo.jpg Günther Frager (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Buenas según el {{PD-textlogo}} dice claramente contiene texto o cuerpo geometríco se considerará del dominio público, el logo de Irkut es totalmente simple. AbchyZa22 (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Images of works for hire by Marcello Canino
Hy everyone. I'm writing here in order to ask for the undeletion of the following images:
- File:Intendenza abside.jpg
- File:Intendenza Filzi.jpg
- File:Napoli - Palazzo della Provincia.jpg
- File:Napoli - Piazza Carità.jpg
- File:Napoli - Piazza Carità2.jpg
- File:Palazzo Matteotti - sede Provincia di Napoli.png
They were all deleted in 2013 after this DR. File:Intendenza abside.jpg and File:Intendenza Filzi.jpg depict de:Palazzo dell’Intendenza di Finanza, degli Uffici Finanziari e dell’Avvocatura di Stato; File:Napoli - Palazzo della Provincia.jpg and File:Palazzo Matteotti - sede Provincia di Napoli.png depict de:Palazzo Matteotti; File:Napoli - Piazza Carità.jpg and File:Napoli - Piazza Carità2.jpg depict (correct me if I'm wrong) de:Palazzo INA (Neapel). All these palaces were designed by it:Marcello Canino (Palazzo Matteotti saw the intervention also of Ferdinando Chiaromonte), and were commissioned by a public institution (see here, here and here), the province in the case of Palazzo Matteotti, most likely the Ministry of Finance and the National Insurance Institution (which at that time was a public entity) for the other two. They were completed between 1936 and 1938, and therefore they all fell under Template:PD-ItalyGov between 1957 and 1959. They are all buildings built way before 1990, so no issue with US copyright.--Friniate (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
raygiftedkeys
this picture of myself is my brand my companies owned source. why is my photo from my brand being deleted when I have a domain and all the information showing my business????? https://raygiftedkeys.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by RayGiftedKeys (talk • contribs)
- See COM:SCOPE; promotional material out of project scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Gloablly locked. --Yann (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hi, Bonjour
This picture was taken for https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Louis_Lejeune_(auteur) His has his own commons category see on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23055061 I've yet uploaded Contributions de Lafloche De Lafloche discuter journal des blocages téléversements journaux Journal des blocages globaux compte global journal des abus Un utilisateur avec 1 759 modifications. Compte créé le 5 avril 2022.
I don't really understand your acts. Best regards,— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafloche (talk • contribs) 17:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour (from Les États-Unis), it was speedy deleted under F10. But subject is notable so Support Abzeronow (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 18:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)