Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Technically indistinguishable |
Likely | Possilikely |
Possible | Unlikely |
Inconclusive | Unrelated |
No action | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
[edit]K1dMag1c1an
[edit]- K1dMag1c1an (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Anzekos (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Uploading clear copyright violation images, same filename as well as same content. Please see File:Anze Kos - TNT Towers (2023).jpg, which was reuploaded by K1dMag1c1an after the upload of Anzekos got deleted. A09 (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
6042*UB80*2K36*1890*7269*9WBK
[edit]- 6042*UB80*2K36*1890*7269*9WBK (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Asharujayne (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: I was not sure, that the users are related, so I only warned one of them and gave relatively short block to another. But they both are new users interested in category:Shikei Syokatu. If sockpuppetry is confirmed, then longer blocks are needed. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. Эlcobbola talk 16:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: See also COM:ANU#6042*UB80*2K36*1890*7269*9WBK/Asharujayne. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 05:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Daeva Trạc
[edit]- Daeva Trạc (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Username of the puppet (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Related IP address, if any (talk • contribs • IP address, if any/lookup WHOIS • IP address, if any.html RBL • tools • luxo's • IP address, if any crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: I’m kind of busy today, so I probably won’t be able to attend in the next 5-6 hours. Anyway, someone accused me to be the sock puppet of C/Đăng Đàn Cung/Musee Annam (that guy), so I request for an IP check for comparison (it seems that my uploads of Canadian landscapes and stuffs aren’t good enough).
Other of my defence included:
1.’Fake flags’: I asked before uploading and editing them
2. Haiphong and RVN Police flag: check the sources would ya
3. That guy have already bothered me
user Nguyentrongphu, you took every of my interest which C also had to accuse me, but any evidences that separated us apart and boom, “he was just faking”. What a win-win logic. And “confirmed sock”? You banned me immediately after I was accused as C in Viet Wikipedia. How the heck am I gonna defend myself when I have already shot dead?
After this has been done, I hope you and your friend would stop with such harassment against me. Consider this as I kneel down and beg. — Daeva Trạc (talk) 10:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined - "Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined" (COM:RFCU). Эlcobbola talk 12:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Эlcobbola: Would the request be accepted if someone else writes it? Do you have another solution to solve this issue? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- There's currently no issue here that needs a solution. "Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons"--Daeva Trạc is not blocked, so what disruption would a check prevent? If Nguyentrongphu, or someone else, believes Daeva Trạc has been socking, they are welcome to present appropriate evidence of a connection and use of those accounts to disrupt the Commons. That would be a valid reason for a check. Эlcobbola talk 12:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Musée Annam's past IPs can be found here. Daeva Trạc and Musée Annam both have an obesession with fictious flags of Vietnam. This is a very niche interest. You can see that Annam's former socks uploaded some of them, and Trạc uploaded some of them. If Trạc's IP are from Canada and real (not proxy/VPN), then it's likely that he's not Musée Annam. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 18:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu: the IPs in the ban discussion you referenced are Vietnamese. Can you elaborate on what you mean by "If Trạc's IP are from Canada"? Эlcobbola talk 19:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- User:elcobbola Trạc claims he's living in Canada. Musée Annam lives in Vietnam, so if Trạc's IPs are real and from Canada, then it's unlikely that he's Musée Annam. This is a problem because Musée Annam has caused a lot of trouble over the years to be global banned by the global community. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- “Same interest”? Should I go outside and call every artist “neo-nazist” for having one same interest with Hitler?
- And for your information, I don’t have an “obsession” with fictitious flags. I have other topics that I take interest and spend way more time in for (see here). — Daeva Trạc (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu: the IPs in the ban discussion you referenced are Vietnamese. Can you elaborate on what you mean by "If Trạc's IP are from Canada"? Эlcobbola talk 19:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Technically Unrelated/ Inconclusive. This may or may not be meaningful. Known socks are stale, and IPs, range allocations, devices, etc. all can change over time. Chronic LTAs are also more likely to understand how to manipulate the tool. This is one reason why Checkuser is not magic pixie dust.. Handling, if any, will need to be based on behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 14:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- User:elcobbola I understand that a lot of things can change over time. However, I just want to know if Trạc's IP are from Vietnam or Canada? Nguyentrongphu (talk) 00:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Susandema
[edit]- Susandema (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Tiendangtran (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Similar edit pattern of uploading unfree portraits of Vietnamese politician, also made similar edits at w:List of presidents of Vietnam, changing the size of the image just like the sock master did. A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Highly Likely. Эlcobbola talk 05:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Shielda
[edit]- Shielda (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Tonkatie (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Adeonunde (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Accounts created within 2 days, all uploading the same kind of files. This looks like fishing for people who got prank calls. Please check for sleepers. Yann (talk) 11:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- No account has edited since 30 April 2024, thus all would be Stale. Эlcobbola talk 13:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK thanks. I blocked the accounts for spamming, and fishing for scams. Yann (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
A3cb1
[edit]- A3cb1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Silini22 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Usual edit pattern.--2A02:9130:94B6:6308:60B7:DF8E:A3A8:1908 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. --Krd 13:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
PlanespotterA320
[edit]- PlanespotterA320 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- 70.34.229.242 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Same behavior of nominating images for deletion based on hypothetical copyright doubts. Highly suspicious that an IP user would be able to discuss obscure aspects of copyright and file deletion requests. --Kges1901 (talk) 13:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Declined - Please review COM:RFCU, including "The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses." Эlcobbola talk 14:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- IMO this should not apply for banned users. So in view of the evidence, I blocked the IP for a week. Yann (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The CheckUser policy does not care about your opinion, Yann. Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Isha.Narain
[edit]- Isha.Narain (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Sai Abyabakar (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: User:Sai Abyabakar has uploaded File:Preity Mukhundhan.jpg and File:Sai Abhyankkar.jpg which are now used on en wiki. User:Radha.Chandran has added them both, [1] and [2] (101.189.11.78). Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like a duck to me. Эlcobbola talk 13:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeraxmoira: You forgot to retransclude this page to COM:RFCU when starting this section, causing it to get lost. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, Twinkle does all the work on EN Wiki, so I am not very familiar with the Commons SPI process. Jeraxmoira (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives